Graphic from Yale Project on Climate Change Communications.
We’ve pointed it out here before, but it bears saying again: Americans love renewable energy. There’s just no ifs, ands or buts about it.
The map above from the Yale Project on Climate Change Communications, which breaks down support for renewable energy at the county level, shows clearly that a majority of Americans in every county in the U.S. support funding for renewable energy. Well, perhaps except for one lone county in southeast Texas–the heart of oil refining country.
And in most places, it’s not just mere majority support, it’s landslide-level support for renewable energy.
So why is it so hard to get production tax credits–a proven mechanism for renewable energy development–renewed through Congress every time they expire? And why does Congress even continue to force them to expire every couple of years, setting up new battles over their continuation? After all, the similar nuclear production tax credits–which have largely failed in their goal of stimulating new reactor construction–were made for twenty years.
The answer may lie in some of the other conflicting measures of public opinion shown on this page (another excellent piece from David Roberts), when renewable energy support is put in the larger context of climate change.
The climate deniers–i.e. the fossil fuel and nuclear industries–have certainly made their case to the American people, or at least confused the issue enough so that people who don’t follow the issue aren’t sure what to think.
Of course, there is no real reason renewable energy has to be placed in the context of climate–renewables make sense in every way, including reliability and cost, the two areas that in the past were problem areas. Now renewables have surpassed nuclear on both, and soon will surpass coal and gas on both as well. At least if you recognize that reliability and “baseload” are two different things, and that one distribution system works to ensure reliable electricity from renewables while an entirely different one works to facilitate baseload power from nuclear power and fossil fuels. Both provide electricity 24/7–which is all ratepayers care about; but one–the system based on renewables–provides that power cleaner, safer, and increasingly cheaper than the baseload system of the 20th century.
Another reason public support for renewables doesn’t necessarily translate into policy support for them may be that while politicians (or at least their campaign managers) may be proficient at reading candidate polls, they’re not as good at reading issue polls, nor at tying together the findings of disparate polls to understand what Americans are really thinking.
So let’s try to tie those loose ends together…..
Here’s another poll from last week, from the University of Michigan. It found that renewables are not just popular in the abstract. In fact, fully 74% of Americans support state Renewable Energy Standards–the kind groups like the Koch Brothers and ALEC have been attacking, with little success, across the country. Perhaps it’s now obvious why they’ve achieved little success. State-level politicians are perhaps more attuned to public opinion …read more
Read more here:: http://safeenergy.org/2015/06/08/keeping-up-with-the-polls/